> “supposed to happen in November 2017”
That’s covered ad nauseam by those of moderate intelligence who read the drops.
Where is John Podesta? Or his bro Tony? They seem to have disappeared off the face of the Earth.
Where is Hillary Rotten? Q said she was allowed to travel outside the country to jurisdictions having an extradition treaty with the US.
And why hasn’t she traveled close to Malaysia where she has $2 billion stashed in a subaccount of Feta Gulen’s who in turn has a $40 billion account there?
Everything is on track with what the Q group said was going down.
Earlier in the year, someone confronted Q with a pissy disposition and ranted “YOU SAID THERE WOULD BE FIREWORKS!”. This person had [ARRESTS ARRESTS ARRESTS WHERE ARE THE ARRESTS?] on the brain. Q responded “North Korea”. North Korea was the ‘fireworks’. But the person confronting Q had developed a fixation somehow on [ARRESTS ARRESTS ARRESTS] and it didn’t occur to them that the term was referencing something else. The result is that certain people start saying Q is fake, Q says things that are not true. etc. You’re one of them.
Some people start to believe their own suppositions. They ‘decode’ and then elevate their interpretation to ‘fact’. Then comically they take their ‘fact’ and confront Q with it only to be smacked down by Q for having a false inference in the first place.
Still other people are told by others what Q said and they confront Q with “But you said YadaYadaYada!” to which Q says “No, I didn’t”.
And some persons outright say they are Q or they are part of Q or they convey info from Q, none of it true.
As for you, no, you don’t have a case. You have an ‘attitude’, and that and a peso might get you a street fart.
“That’s covered ad nauseam by those of moderate intelligence who read the drops.”
Obviously not, since you can not “cover” the fact that Q made many concrete predictions that absolutely failed to happen. All that the Q followers can do is try to dance around that fact, conveniently ignoring some predictions, or speculating that others might have been fulfilled even though you can’t produce any evidence of it. Just as you did in this post.
“Where is John Podesta?”
Visiting Yale giving a speech pretty recently:
https://news.yale.edu/2018/04/10/john-podesta-former-presidential-chief-staff-visit-campus
He also writes articles for the Washington Post, runs the Center for American Progress, and has a teaching job at Georgetown Law school. Not much of a mystery there.
“Where is Hillary Rotten?”
In the news pretty constantly since she stopped hiding in the Chappaqua woods a few weeks after the election.
“Q said she was allowed to travel outside the country to jurisdictions having an extradition treaty with the US.”
So “Q said” she could do what anyone can do, which is proof that Q isn’t full of ****. Right.
“Everything is on track with what the Q group said was going down.”
Nope, there have been no mass arrests, no martial law, no use of the Emergency Broadcast System, no massive riots in all major cities, etc. All things that Q predicted which of course failed to materialize because Q is a pathetic con artist.
“But the person confronting Q had developed a fixation somehow on [ARRESTS ARRESTS ARRESTS]”
Gee, maybe because Q predicted such and they completely failed. Sorry, I know you really are emotionally invested and want to believe in this fraud, but when someone promises one thing and it never happens and they try to substitute something else, that is not confirmation. That’s called a bait & switch.
“Some people start to believe their own suppositions. They ‘decode’ and then elevate their interpretation to ‘fact’.”
There is no “decoding” to be done with his predictions for November 2016 that completely failed. Sorry, but he made concrete predictions in plain english, and people asked him many questions and he gave detailed further explanations, in plain english, about what was supposed to happen. Then none of it happened.