“shame its not a signed Q post”
Yeah, except it is.
“maybe of you actually read q you would know the difference between an annon comment to q and a post by q”
That’s not a comment to him, that’s a comment from him. As I have already explained to you, it’s tied to his unique identifier on 4chan, so it could only have been posted by him. That’s why this post is archived as a Q post in the various archives of his posts. Obviously you must have started following this phenomenon quite some time after it started if you would even question that he made that post, as it is one of his more infamous early posts.
You’re not squirming out of it, he made the post, he made specific predictions in the post, none of those predictions ever happened. He’s a fraud and a liar.
what a surprise still didn’t watch the video?
But I really love the sweet irony of you trying to use an “alleged Q post’ as your ‘proof’ when you’ve spent days telling people not to believe Q