Ok riddle me this then..
Why in the world would we want Q outted at this particular time?
It is the message not the medium.
I think we will have to agree to disagree on this one.
Winner has to send a batch of Trump sugar cookies to the other.
LoL
From an Anon:
Hey Q, I just watched the body language video of the Rosenstien’s testimony.
“/OurGuy/” my butt. I hope he is hung for treason.
I don’t think Q outed in the sense of “who is he”; for one thing, Q is obviously a team.
But “is Q legitimate” would be the Question.
Q answered that question in his very next post. I'm sure he anticipated it. I wondered why too.
It must happen.
Conspiracy no more.
Think of every post made.
It would force us to prove everything stated to avoid looking crazy, correct?
What do they fear the most?
Public awakening.
If they ask.
They self destruct.
They know this is real.
See attacks.
The build is near complete.
Growing exponentially.
I sure hope I win, since I can't make cookies. You'd have to settle for store boughts from the Piggly Wiggly (we don't have one, I just like saying Piggly Wiggly. Ask me another time for the tale of Piggly Wiggly and Bagster. In Q down time.)
Bagster

Excerpt...
(Conservative Tribune) A federal watchdog that investigates improper political activities by federal employees filed a formal complaint Wednesday against an immigration judge who it claims promoted former Democratic candidate Hillary Clintons immigration policies from the bench.
The U.S. Office of Special Counsel alleges that Carmene Zsa-Zsa DePaolo, an immigration judge based in Southern California, violated the Hatch Act when she praised Clintons immigration reform plans during a deportation hearing in March 2016. The Hatch Act is a little-enforced federal law that bars executive branch employees from using federal resources to promote political candidates, among other prohibitions.