Mind you, the man wasn't using the word, it was part of a list of objectionable words which was under discussion.
This reminds me of the story of the scorpion and the frog.
“Mind you, the man wasn’t using the word, it was part of a list of objectionable words which was under discussion.”
He does deserve a Nelson Muntz ha ha for getting burned by the fire he helped create and fully supports.
But the logic doesn’t hold up. For example, these things are not to be done: murder, rape, battery. Do they need to be done to explain what they are?