She lost custody in court already. That alone tells you shes some kind of -serious- crazy.
NO, that is the most dangerous kind of thinking in the context of the legal system.
If you are a conservative, and well-thought-out, you must — must — understand, believe, and subscribe to (or you are not any kind of conservative) the idea that:
“POWER CORRUPTS AND ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY”
or put more usefully “increasing degrees of power corrupts at increasing degrees.”
Any type any aspect of life or government is immune from accountability...
... human nature is for that institution or organization to become increasingly abusive and corrupt.
If you do not subscribe to that truth, you are not and never have been within a million miles of being a conservative.
To the degree that we ASSUME that any institution is always acting correctly, to that degree it will grow increasingly erroneous, reckless, false, deceitful, and corrupt.
When you assume that the FBI never does anything wrong,
to that extent the FBI starts doing wrong and does more and more wrong until we start to impose scrutiny and accountability.
When you assume that the courts always get it right...
... to that extent the courts become reckless, irrational, erroneous, and corrupt, until we impose scrutiny and accountability.
The idea that because a court deprived someone of custody means that that was the CORRECT result...
... is an outrageously illogical and dangerous idea.
The idea that any decision by a court “MUST” have been the correct decision is not only a logical fallacy, but the soil in which weeds grow.