You're missing pertinent facts. The OP is the lawyer for the woman, and is spamming FR by pasting a news release under "News" thingly disguised as a news article, in a transparent attempt to raise funds for the case. He even shows himself as the author.
Maybe he can fill in the blanks, but then that would be "commenting on a case in progress," right? Just send money!
Or pull the spam thread.
thingly = thinly
As far as the purpose of the post, I was unawre of it and agree that that purpose should not be used for a FreeRep post.
That said, and like other’s cause for concern, with what facts are known, my negative opinion of the judge is unchanged - no matter is the purpose in how & why the thread was started.
Thank you for the clarification.
It hurts that I am so gullible.
Incorrect. The press release allows only 400 words. We will be posting the court reporter transcripts as they become available. You can see it for yourself.