[bagster]

I dint mind when Horowitz couldn’t fully answer cause almost every time it was cause he didn’t want to give away info of other ongoing investigations.

Good point and agreed. Though it bugged me that not ONE committee member of either the Senate of the House mentioned (unless I missed it) that the statement "found no evidence" of something happening is not the same as saying that thing didn't happen. In this case, "bias effected outcome."

Horowitz too easily slipped from "lack of evidence" to "it didn't happen" mode and nobody checked him.

I wonder how he felt sitting there listening to the Dems use his bogus, poorly worded conclusion to beat try to beat issue over the head.

Bagster

[SERKIT]

I wonder how he felt sitting there listening to the Dems use his bogus, poorly worded conclusion to beat try to beat issue over the head.

I wonder how he felt knowing that Rosenweasel, Comey, Lynch, (even McCabe) et al modified and edited his work before it went public.

Is the version he submitted to Congress anything close to what he really wrote?