Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PhiloBedo

“My first thought is angular momentum equals high G forces in the lateral.”

That was my first thought, too, but if you want to get into orbit, it’s hard to avoid high G forces.


4 posted on 06/17/2018 8:43:51 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: rightwingcrazy

True, but with the conventional method, the g forces are along the axis. I’m thinking of the engineering required to handle high g forces pushing out to the side. Think of it like a stick being able to take a lot of pressure end to end, but not so much on the side.


10 posted on 06/17/2018 8:50:01 PM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches, and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: rightwingcrazy
A rocket launch pulls 4-8 G's. This thing -- according to the article -- would pull 40-60 thousand G's. Most things would turn into mush under that acceleration. How heavy would a satellite have to be to be "G-hardened" enough to take 60,000 G's?
24 posted on 06/18/2018 5:14:47 AM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson