> “As for Strzok’s more controversial exchanges with Page, Goelman (Strzok’s attorney) told the Post that there’s “no question” that his client regrets the messages, but that he was expressing his political opinions in what he thought was a private conversation.”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-agent-peter-strzok-willing-to-testify-before-congress
So Strzok thought his intent to kill the King was private but now seeks “the chance to clear his name and tell his story.”
The fact is he was never going to be offered immunity and he was going to be subpoenaed. As far as not invoking his 5th Amendment right, it doesn’t matter. The incriminating evidence is already established. He took an Oath as part of his job meaning he’s squarely under the treason statute and if convicted could be put to death.
No one’s been put to death for treason since the Civil War, and then I think it was only one. Recent typical sentences are 10 years. With the high Constitutional requirements, it’s not worth the effort when ‘lesser’ charges can get stiffer sentences.
Exit out was missing what?
Q
OMG!! Look what @KStreckf just pointed out at 35:38 of this video!!!
WHERE IS OBAMA'S HAND?! This video has been tampered with!! That's why Q wanted us to suffer through it!! https://t.co/EQ8Mqo3zns pic.twitter.com/kfcdu2WCkL— Swamp Drainer (@FedupWithSwamp) June 17, 2018
What do you think will be his excuse when questioned, other than private opinion that never affected his work?