Replies

I concur from that perspective - but I think it’s only useful for that purpose - NEWS unlocks the MAP. People having knowledge of the who/what/when/why/how/where etc. behind the news from the map can discuss details of such without having to prove “Q” - which is pointless. “Q” directs to “open source” and we have more than we know. We don’t have to prove “Q”, just direct others to the same “open source”. See how the same happens with trolls on these threads - they challenge “Q” but they can’t challenge facts that “Q” leads folks to discover and answer the questions. IMO ;)

I see your point. It's a good one. But there are certain "facts" that will never make it into the news, a large percentage of them, Q has told us. I would like people to believe EVERYTHING Q is hinting at, and before it hits the news.

The news is so last century.

I do appreciate your point. We are in agreement on it. I just want more.

Bagster

NEWS unlocks the Media Access Pass?

I concur from that perspective - but I think it’s only useful for that purpose - NEWS unlocks the MAP. People having knowledge of the who/what/when/why/how/where etc. behind the news from the map can discuss details of such without having to prove “Q” - which is pointless. “Q” directs to “open source” and we have more than we know. We don’t have to prove “Q”, just direct others to the same “open source”. See how the same happens with trolls on these threads - they challenge “Q” but they can’t challenge facts that “Q” leads folks to discover and answer the questions. IMO ;)
___________________________________________________

I share your opinion but you said it so much better than I have in prior posts. Q is “open source”. That’s what bores me about trolls who attack Q as a kid in a basement etc. (myeah....riggggght). The attacks on Q miss the point that, in the final analysis, the truth does not depend on Q’s identity at all. With the help of Q and the Anons, We The People are laying hands on evidence already out there. Once we were able to do our own research and build our own knowledge, the black hats lost control of the narrative. There’s nothing the MSM can say to refute our knowledge base.

In the past, I have been too quick to dismiss Q proofs for this reason. But Q has pointed to their importance and where Q goes, I go.