Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: schurmann

Yeah, but I was an artillerymen for 16 years and the only system I used that came even close to RAM-jet speeds was the Lance (MGM-52) missile, which would do mach 3 by the time it cleared the launcher. With 8”, 155mm and 105mm, I could see the rounds leaving the tubes and sometimes track them downrange. All of the RAM-jet tests I’ve seen were after the missile was accelerated to Mach5 with a SRB. I just can’t imagine a RAM-jet in a 155mm sized projectile or, really, any tube artillery projectile.


26 posted on 06/15/2018 4:21:31 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: SJSAMPLE

“...All of the RAM-jet tests I’ve seen were after the missile was accelerated to Mach5 with a SRB. I just can’t imagine a RAM-jet in a 155mm sized projectile or, really, any tube artillery projectile.”

I will defer to SJSAMPLE on the possibilities of fitting any ramjet-powered system inside a gun tube. I’m certain he’s correct.

Ramjets have been employed in hypersonic vehicle research, but not all require speeds that high to operate.

The 2K12 Kub (”Cube”) low/medium altitude SAM system developed by the USSR in the 1950s/1960s used a novel propulsion system: when its solid-fuel booster burned out, the cavity in the airframe thus created became a ramjet, sustaining the missile inflight. Max missile velocity was Mach 1.75 to 2.8, depending on variant.


28 posted on 06/16/2018 10:44:36 AM PDT by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson