The whole investigation was biased. The way they gathered evidence, the kid gloves with which they handled Shrillary...everything pointed to an investigation which the result had already been determined.
They specifically did not dig very deep in the emails department..and that’s just one aspect.
See, even Blackmon agrees with me LoL
This IG Report is Devastating for the FBI; The Next One Will be Even Worse (excellent analysis)
dbdailyupdate.com ^ | 6/14/18 | David Blackmon
Now, what this report does a great job of is setting the stage for the next report, which will be the climax of Horowitz’s work. It’s like Act I of a three act play. Here is the scene it sets:
1) Don't believe anyone who claims Horowitz didn't find bias. He very carefully says that he found no "documentary" evidence that bias produced "specific investigatory decisions." That's different #IGReport2) It means he didn't catch anyone doing anything so dumb as writing down that they took a specific step to aid a candidate. You know, like: "Let's give out this Combetta immunity deal so nothing comes out that will derail Hillary for President." #IGReport
3) But he in fact finds bias everywhere. The examples are shocking and concerning, and he devotes entire sections to them. And he very specifically says in the summary that they "cast a cloud" on the entire "investigation's credibility." That's pretty damning. #IGReport
4) Meanwhile this same cast of characters who the IG has now found to have made a hash of the Clinton investigation and who demonstrate such bias, seamlessly moved to the Trump investigation. And we're supposed to think they got that one right? #IGReport