Paraphrasing Turley, Sessions could appoint a SC to prosecute, but he doesn't have to because Huber can prosecute.
In reply to Varney, Turley agrees that Huber and SC have the same power.
And if Huber's scope doesn't reach as far as Sessions wants, Sessions can ALSO appoint a SC for certain cases. it isn't one or the other.
Sorry, my original post may have been poorly stated. Yes, I understand what you are saying.
Q keeps posting this link. He/They really want us to understand the information in that article.
What is says for me is appointing Huber and instruction him to work with Horowitz expands the scope and Sessions will know how these investigations are going. I believe Sessions can and will influence decisions made in Utah where he cannot influence decision made by SC Mueller.
Am I way off base here?
BREAKING RED ALERT : Democrat operative involved in Obama administration HACKING of state voting systems https://t.co/aVnXkaBszX— Lee Stranahan (@stranahan) June 13, 2018
Goodlatte was on Maria’s show this past Sunday talking about Huber.