Posted on 06/08/2018 6:32:00 PM PDT by EdnaMode
Hollywood actress Jodie Foster said she would be “much more comfortable having robots” own a gun than an emotional human doing so.
“I mean, I’d be much more comfortable having robots have them, but we are designed to have emotions that overflow and that are not guided by our heads,” the Hannibal star said in a recent interview with Indie Wire.
“To have sentient beings that are completely and entirely guided by their emotions have the power to administer life or death using one kilowatt of energy in a nanosecond is just unfathomable with me,” Foster added.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Maybe the can be on the driver less cars? Those things never fail.
Why don’t we make Jodie Foster the head of everything.
And who programs the robots?
Who programs the robots? Actors should be first on the kill list
I only wanted women to be able to marry men. Guess neither of us gets our wish, Jodie-Jode.
John Hinckley is thinking, “You mean I shot Reagan for THAT?!?!?!”
The original WESTWORLD comes to mind.
I’m a Transformers fan who has written novel length fan fics and I would just like to say that she thinks a unliving robot can own something is cute.
As we say in the South: we’ll bless her heart!
I’m not concerned with Jodie Foster’s comfort.
Why would a robot need a gun?
Well, she probably prefers robotic penises to real ones, or robotic female parts.
Well, a robot is the closest thing to resemble a liberal.
Robots don’t use their heads to think. Neither do liberals. All brainless.
I might need to apologize to robots.
What a total moron. She apparently doesn’t realize that robots are controlled by humans. Most actors are far from the sharpest knives in the drawer
Playing make believe in hollywood really does a number on peoples heads. She seems to have lost touch with reality. Sentient being? Does anyone really talk like that?
” one kilowatt of energy “
KW is power, not energy.
Is there nothing that wealthy entertainers don’t know? And they’re so generous about sharing their wisdom.
And yet, I have heard that allowing drones or robots make the decision to kill without human agency is considered by the international community to be a WAR CRIME.
At least that is what I have heard.
Is THAT what she is advocating?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.