Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: biggerten

Yes - I noticed that of course AFTER I posted. Surprising. Although earlier in the article it also said it was a lot warmer than today based on the trees at the sites. So that to me would imply that there was LESS snowpack/glaciers. (Which would cause higher water levels).


36 posted on 06/04/2018 8:48:01 PM PDT by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: 21twelve; biggerten

Wiki indicates that Lake Superior is about 300’ higher in elevation than when it was at it’s lowest point with all the ice on it. Rocks moving over millions of years is one thing. The entire plate moving 300’ in 12,000 years or whatever - that’s pretty amazing.


37 posted on 06/04/2018 8:54:20 PM PDT by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: 21twelve; biggerten

Wiki indicates that Lake Superior is about 300’ higher in elevation than when it was at it’s lowest point with all the ice on it. Rocks moving over millions of years is one thing. The entire plate moving 300’ in 12,000 years or whatever - that’s pretty amazing.


38 posted on 06/04/2018 8:54:21 PM PDT by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson