Posted on 05/31/2018 10:06:14 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
There is no such thing as an incel because there are a lot of women who will hoe themselves out to any guy for the price of a drink.
Incel - that word hasn’t made it to the Oxford Dictionary yet, has it?
In my day, we just called them “Nerds.”
Not these days buddy.
Also, the essayist doesn't come out and say it, but two solutions to the supposed incel problem are sex robots and legalized and societally sanctioned prostitution. However, progressive types at the moment seem to believe that sex robots are oppressive to women and prostitutes are all sex slaves.
What to do?
In Cel.
Involuntary Celibate?
Huh?
Good grief.
Now, none of this exonerates conservatives, of course.This is godless and satanic anti-family propaganda. Utter Marxist gobbledegook. The traditional family is the cornerstone of any society, and its breakdown destroys society.
All too many social conservatives want to shut down pornography, tighten controls on prostitution, and restore puritanical norms from a time when men and women could only try to meet their sexual needs within the confines of life-long matrimony. This obviously should not (and will not) happen, if for no other reason than it traps too many couples in emotionally and sexually dead marriages. …
The root cause is that its getting more and more difficult to get sex or a girlfriend. Society tends to blame the incel themselves but the defeatist attitude their critics characterize them as having has always been around. What has changed is the growing accusatory atmosphere and the breakdown of family and community where the guidance of boys by masculine male peers and fathers has been replaced with the ‘advice’ of post-menopausal lesbian college professors which of course is hardly the most effective way to get laid
Through out human history there’s been 2 systems of mating: Polygamy and Monogamy.
Monogamy we all know and understand. It’s essentially a system were wives are distributed in equal numbers to men. A man willing to work hard enough will always be able to acquire a wife.
Polygamy is where the Alpha males get most of the women and the wifeless men were often quite violent about the unequal distribution of mates. Men with many wives seldom put a lot of work in rearing the children either. Polygamists civilizations tend to have a lot of violence with men who can’t acquire wives either having to be funneled into wars to get them killed or to steal their tribe’s enemies women.
BTW, this is the reason that Islam is inherently violent. Islam without Polygamy tends to be stable and somewhat productive. But such things never last since the Mohammad promoted Polygamy.
The sexual revolution destroyed the old system of Monogamous pair bonding ordered by Patriarchy and allowed women to chose which type of system they wanted. Now the vast majority of men through out history have always preferred Monogamy beside the few Alpha males at the top who prefer Polygamy. Women on the other hand always like to mate up in the social hierarchy and when given the choice they’d rather share a high status man than marry a lesser man and have him all to their own. So women chose Polygamy and young men are becoming violent because of it.
There’s also a good scientific reason that young men who can’t get laid to act violently: It’s attractive to women. The normal social hierarchy is easily hacked by men willing to who appear to be violent and the easiest way to appear to be violent, is to be violent as seen in America’s inner cities.
As far as I can tell, "incels" are a microminority of people who suffer severe autism or have some kind of IQ or other psychological problem. I don't think there are enough of them to warrant an article about, nor do I think we've ever not had them around.
There was supposed to be a grin after that.
Pickups almost never happen at bars anymore. I think you’re too old to understand how things work now.
>As far as I can tell, “incels” are a microminority of people who suffer severe autism or have some kind of IQ or other psychological problem. I don’t think there are enough of them to warrant an article about, nor do I think we’ve ever not had them around.
You’re quite wrong. 20 years ago this was the case. Not today. Polygamy is normal now for young women and thanks to tinder and other apps a large segment of men don’t get anything because most women are largely having sex with the same population of top tier men.
So then, you’ve never watched Jersey Shore I take it.
The author predicates the entire article on the blatantly untrue pretense that promiscuous sex is the highest human objective. Far from providing joy and lasting happiness, sexual relations outside of the marital union it was intended for will only lead to sorrow and bitter loneliness. It is tragic that over-education pseudo-intellectuals like the author can be fooled into giving up their intellect and reason in pursuit of an empty base instinct. They would rather be worms than men.
“In my day, we just called them “Nerds.””
It used to be called bachelor.
This is why people got married young.
Those marriages were stronger and lasted longer than things going now.
Pick up artistry is about teaching men who are close to being alpha-male types how to manipulate women in various ways to obtain casual sex with many women more efficiently. In terms of this article, they are teaching males on the beneficiary side of the sexual revolution how to take advantage of their status.
PUAs do prey on incels to sell their products, but actual incels who are just very undesirable to women will not benefit from the things they teach.
Pretty much.
Reason is loony tunes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.