Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: meyer

Post 110 above has a link that leads to a site where Wikileaks is criticizing Q. If Wikileaks is part of the Q movement, why would it criticize or make the type of in that link? If JA has been cut off, is it possible that others may be controlling the narrative?

I’m generally a lurker on this thread, and wonder why Wikileaks is now criticizing Israel, or doubting Q.


132 posted on 05/28/2018 6:07:54 PM PDT by Yulee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]



133 posted on 05/28/2018 6:12:08 PM PDT by TruthWillWin ([MSM])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

To: Yulee

nite


134 posted on 05/28/2018 6:14:52 PM PDT by smileyface (Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

To: Yulee

I don’t think we can be sure who is posting for Wikileaks.


139 posted on 05/28/2018 6:26:55 PM PDT by StormFlag (May the Light shine and darkness remove, MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

To: Yulee

The last couple of days I’ve noticed that there are many more negative tweets about Qanan. A week ago, when I would search, I found only positive tweets.

I think Twitter and Facebook are censoring Q discussion and the word has gone out to the 4am club to make negative comments.

Desperation, perhaps? They won’t go without a struggle, you know.


176 posted on 05/28/2018 9:06:47 PM PDT by Melian (Patriots fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson