If I understood the judges ruling right, she’s not saying that individuals can’t block people on their threads.
She’s basically saying that because Trump holds the Office of President, his use of Twitter makes it a public forum and thus he can’t block people on his.
So no one else except high government officials is affected by her ruling and thus they wouldn’t have standing.
And Twitter isn’t going to help the President out. They’re too busy blocking conservatives.
But that public forum characterization has to also apply to all the Reps, Senators, Governors, Attorney Generals, and other elected officials as well as judges and other appointed political officers. It also applies to Candidates for the same offices, and in reality ex-Presidents, Senators, etc.
Does anyone really believe that if President Trump's Twitter feed is a public forum that Rep. Pelosi's isn't?
And by the way, the twitter feeds of police departments, fire departments, school districts, and every other public function are also public forums it seems. So apparently a police department or school can't ban posters on their twitter feed, no matter what the posters publish. Somehow I don't think the judge would rule the same in those cases.
I wonder how many posters @BrowardSheriff has blocked?
If so it will have to include every elected official who uses twitter to discuss public policy.
I'm sure there are liberals in office who have banned conservatives posting to their account.
It's time to assert our new-found rights.