[Amendment10]

"When I called and they hung up on me I kept calling and complained about their hanging up on me. Finally they listened on speaker phone while I made my polite comments about the judge being ill advised in her decision."

I’m not expecting you to do this.

At your discretion, call judge’s office back and ask for the specific constitutional clause that Pres. Trump would be violating by blocking Twitter followers.

If you do so, please let us know how they responded.

[Agamemnon]

At your discretion, call judge’s office back and ask for the specific constitutional clause that Pres. Trump would be violating by blocking Twitter followers.

I see a possible silver lining here.

Consider all the Orwellian shadow-banning and Conservative blog discrimination that occurs on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc.

If Trump can't block posters from posting "content" to his Twitter account as a matter of it being ruled in Federal Court to be a "public forum" then how much less a public forum is FaceBook, and every other Twitter account?

Under this ruling FaceBook, et. al. should not be allowed to shadow ban and censor Conservative speech which leftists find to be so repulsive on the grounds of asserting private property rights, because if FaceBook is anything, it was always meant to serve as a public forum.

This case may go where the leftist Silicon Valley thought police and control freaks never expected it to go.

FReegards!