Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster
There will never be unequivocal evidence.

Skeptics are fine. As long as they are open minded about events, things work out in a sensible fashion.

Think of it this way, there are people who would criticize (do criticize) Trump for positions, actions (stop tweeting!) ... and things will work out irrespective of the criticism.

Q is in the same boat, but of course with more built-in negativity.

986 posted on 05/20/2018 8:54:17 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 981 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Q


987 posted on 05/20/2018 8:54:41 PM PDT by Yulee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 986 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt
Oh yea, I'm with you on that cboldt. I'm still waiting on the Deep State's new strategy which I predicted long ago (cause I'm an autist, you see).

Once the deepies/media accept that Q is authentic in the face of undeniable proof, they move into phase two. To accuse the President (thru Q) of "leaking" national security secrets. This is the reason that Q is cryptic, in my opinion.

So yea, you are very right. As usual.

Bagster

Lesser Oracle

996 posted on 05/20/2018 9:04:41 PM PDT by bagster (The Bagster Alliance is insidous. The B clique is mighty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 986 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson