Posted on 05/19/2018 11:38:32 PM PDT by ransomnote
I watch as Smoky415 tries to convince us hes broken the code, while others see all sorts of progress. I see Andrew McCabe as the only positive occurrence. Nobody else has been indicted....Hillary, Obama, Cheryl Mills, Loretta Lynch, Huma, the Podesta brothers. Oh sure NXIVM occurred, but we dont know if thats a result of Q and so I still wait patiently for the storm or SHTF.
Aside from good hard foreign policy by Trump regarding North Korea and Iran, I dont see that as A result of Q. Its Trumps work.
I want Clapper and Brennan to face justice as well as the next guy. Ill be very happy if something finally occurs, but up til now, I dont see a lot of evidence of white hats taking down black hats. I only see that Trump has succeeded on foreign policy efforts and with his domestic agenda. I will continue to patiently wait.
When I go to the article about Eisenhower and then return to the post a large Hillary graphic appears briefly, before the return. Same thing happened after hitting the link to the Aztec Eagle.
Is this something that has been imbedded by Wikipedia?
Is anyone else seeing this?
When I went to the Wikipedia articles about Eisenhower and then clicked to return to your post this graphic keeps appearing. It must be a bleedover into your previous post.
Just a side effect of your browser trying to redraw the page. The graphic was posted two posts below that.
Noting embedded in that link.
*Nothing embedded in that link.
Excellent point.
BTW if the tens of thousands of manly men my friend saw heading NE in Kansas and Colorado on their bikes are part of the troops, the Calvary is on its way!
>>”I dunno. Last time I looked errybody was all excited about >> a picture of a pen.
>>Look today, errybody excited about a picture of a pen.”
“Look—Pen!” Like, “Look, squirrel!”
To me, a likely reference to an Executive Order of some sort.
Add to my list....I just read Bongino on Reddit. One of the spies planted in the Bush camp is George Nader. In addition being convicted of child pornograhy, his lawyer Kathryn Ruemmler, was an attorney for Obama and currently represents Susan Rice in Obamagate.
Believing Mueller is a good actor is really wishful thinking
Something that Q has advised us to do on numerous drops. I have bought stock in Orville Redenbacher just for the coming times, so get yours, sit back, watch for new drops, sort through the clues if you care to, and enjoy. I promise you that your taxes will not go up if you can't figure them out. Watch the other smart folks wrestle with them, if you like, but don't get stressed if you don't agree with some one else about what the owl means or what you can or cannot see in the owls eye. I once again promise that Hillery won't get away if you can't come to a agreement.
In short, chill folks. Get back to the Q thread being a meeting place for smart, good hearted patriots who have a penchant for puzzle solving, and an occasional laugh from Bagster.
My $.02
Wingy
Well said Wingy, 2nd that!
Yay for the new thread and thankQ.
I thought about the owl photo this morning.
IMHO the owl-is-evil is the wrong track.
Owls are predators. I think Q is saying “he” iow white hats, are the owl, and the black hats are the mouse, and the owl sees the mouse and I couldn’t tell if the owl had prey in its talons or not. If it has prey in its talons, the black hats are caught but maybe not dead yet.
Either way, to me the owl is saying the black hats are caught.
Q
I have to agree, regrettably. 7 or more consecutive posts one right after another is a HIJACKING... Seems out of place... and not sure if it is adding anything to the effort of not. Sure using up bandwidth!
Q has been coy about the whole thing: “If RM is dirty, RR is dirty. If RR is dirty, RM is dirty.”
OK, I knew that. But it would help to have it nailed down. Q can’t tell us because we need to keep our enemies guessing until the last possible minute.
That is my pov. And I also think they are not dirty. Maybe not saints, but doing the right thing.
Agree
Owls are predators. They eat rats and skunks ! How appropriate!
I believe that Halper may be fatter than Corsi.
This thread either polices itself with judicious resort to admonition and other tricks of the trade, or the project will move off FR.
Lets all give bagster a round of applause. He correctly predicted the next PAIN day.
go here
https://www.calendar-365.com/calendar/2018/May.html
look at length of day for May 23
14h 41m
14h = 840m
+
41m
=
881
Think MIRROR
188
My Theory: Comey tipped Trump off after he won the election. Strzok and Page were being surveilled when they interviewed Flynn, which occurred in the White House, "secretly", in January 2017 and before Nunes made his trip to see Trump. I suspect use of FISA was at Comey's advice - O was going to spy anyway - Comey couldn't stop it and wanted a preserved record somewhere, and tricked O in to using FISA. Comey then ruins Hs chances with his press conference, so Trump could get in. It was his idea to do the presser, but he convinced O etc. it would help H. Trump wins. Then Comey tells Trump, and Trump and Comey set up RR and Mueller with the firing -- purposely triggered the "insurance policy". Counter investigation was already underway as of Trump's swearing. Prediction: After the investigation, Comey is reappointed FBI director and is branded an American Hero and goes down as the slickest law man in US history, which is what Comey would want. Comey is a smart man and a top notch lawyer, no lawyer of his caliber acts the way he is acting. He's a smoke screen. This is the only explination that makes sense to me. In closing, I think if you believe Flynn's interview was part of a counter investigation of Strzok and Page, then you should also believe the rest follows -- who else had the knowledge AND OPPORTUNITY to tip off Trump? Who is the only person who had private meetings with Trump outside of even Priebus' sight? Why? It was too big to trust anyone. It was Trump and Comey. It's been Trump and Comey.... think about it. Without Comey, we would not be where we are today...
These are a few of the comments following this post:
I like the way you presented information in your post. Been trying to convey this, and I think you've done a good job.
Comey is not that stupid - I too, hope, that this is correct.
Comey had to gain the trust of the swamp (hillary, O), and was able to convince them to do all kinds of things in which Comey knew were being recorded.
I think Comey's twitter posts also have double meanings. He is posting for the general public and swamp, but I think he's referring to the fact that he's ultimately doing the right thing behind the scenes.
In addition to Comey playing both sides (becasue he has to) he is likely being help captive by the swamp, thus his efforts to "bumble" every little thing.
Each one of his little "bumbles" Is on purpose, but it has to appear legit to both sides.
I really hope all of this comes out soon. We can praise Comey if this is indeed what is happening - but we will wait to see.
His action of reopening the investigation into the emails is what ended up swinging the pendulum back towards Trump for many voters that werent solid for either candidate I believe. That is the only reason why I had never fully written him off.
Perhaps Obama and Clinton had dirt on Comey or blackmailed him into doing their bidding, so he did what he was supposed to do, but always hated himself for it, always had a heavy conscience. Trump offered him a path to redemption....to actually doing to right thing?
Mike Rogers met Trump at Trump Tower. I like your theory though and it fits in with Gowdy saying History will be much kinder to James Comey.
This makes sense to me. I remember Trey Gowdy saying after Comey let Hillary off the hook that Comey had no choice and did the right thing but he couldnt and wouldnt say why. I couldnt figure it out as Gowdy is no slouch either. Maybe this is what he was talking about.
Very interesting (as Artie Johnson would say), I haven't bought into this theory 100% but it is possible?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.