Did Jim Robinson say you could be *threadmama now, over *ransomnote?
I missed that part.
A sophomoric perusal of this thread’s history of any real combat here, started with your nanny gate arrival.
It’s been a nuisance, and no doubt you will cheerfully destroy this thread before you finish knocking off those who protest your interference.
Particularly outstanding is your vitriol against the guys around here, I noticed. They have finally signaled you that they have had enough of your inability to get along with the thread lane, rather than endure your rabbit trails and your tutorials on what the thread lane should look like to your satisfaction.
Hmmm...
So, where does all this leave *ransomnote. Have you lent instructions as to where she is positioned. What to do with ransomnote....? That is the question.
FREE *RANSOMNOTE!
A sophomoric perusal of this thread’s history of any real combat here, started with your nanny gate arrival....
I believe hm was here - on the Q threads - before you were. Before a lot of the thread monitors were, too. IIRC.
I remember welcoming you aboard these threads. Was happy to see you come around to Q, and offer your valued input, here.
We need to all go back to being supportive of each other.
Just saying.
I was asked to contact Jim. I did.
Most of us were not involved with the locked thread. I for one didn’t even know it happened
I did have some experience with why ,Jim locks thread being a participant/ lurker on smoky back room threads for years
The paragraph I repeated was exactly as it has been for years. He encourages open discussion except for conspiracy. ie sandy Hook , aliens, 911 etc
Ransom note meant well and was encourage to follow the lead of people who may not have had experience or understood Jim stance. (Since it appeared she had not discussed exactly what was forbidden )I asked. Now we know. All of us. All cleared up (she could have done the same. )
Transparency
Agree. The Trumpet train devolved. Let’s man up!