Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
I imagine they deliberately kept Haspel in the dark.

She should be able to fill in some blanks as to travel, meeting schedules, observations, etc. I really don't think she is clueless.

8 posted on 05/17/2018 9:35:29 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: SERKIT

Its common practice to keep station chiefs in the dark. Based on common sense Station Chiefs are assigned by management not by the party in power. I believe its possible to have a station chief being in charge but yet still not allowed anywhere near secret meetings most likely held in rooms designed for no outside sources otherwise the bad guys could tap into anything they wish. I look fwd to what happens once she becomes the head of the CIA. I am sure she has had enough of the political games pulled by Obama and his band of crooks...like the DOJ, the IRS,an so forth......


10 posted on 05/17/2018 9:51:57 AM PDT by straps (Fed up with Libertarians who live in lala land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT

I do not think that is a fair analysis. The DOJ and FBI kept this hidden on purpose, and I doubt Brennan was keeping everyone else in the CIA in the dark, save for a trusted aide or two.


11 posted on 05/17/2018 9:57:36 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson