If the conduct is a pattern that can be prosecuted under RICO:
At Least One Racketeering Act Must Have Been Committed On Or After October 15, 1970 and the Last Racketeering Act Must Have Been Committed Within Ten Years of a Prior Act
CRIMINAL RICO:
18 U.S.C. §§1961-1968
A Manual For Federal Prosecutors
SIXTH REVISED EDITION May 2016
This ten-year requirement has occasionally led to the mistaken view that RICO has a ten-year limitations period. See Section VI(Q) below.
In fact, this requirement means only that the last racketeering act must have occurred within ten years after commission of a prior racketeering act that is essential to establish the requisite two acts.
For example, if only two racketeering acts constitute the pattern and the first act occurred in 1995, the last act must have occurred within ten years after 1995.
If more than two acts constitute the pattern, it is permissible to have a time span longer than ten years between the first and last racketeering acts as long as the last racketeering act is within ten years of the prior racketeering act.
https://www.justice.gov/usam/file/870856/download
There’s LOTS of time. Don’t worry.
Thanks, all. Good to know. Informative on RICO, which is famous for trapping the demonic.
Laying the ground is what Q has been referencing, citing and assuring. Q confirmations are increasing like birth pangs, and the rain is increasing to storm proportion.
Laying out the political landscape and the calendar, for midterms and even 2020, is not lost among the brains of our outfit, either.
Who said that timing is meaningless? NO ONE. Ever.