Hmmm!? I may be on the wrong page here but IIRC I thought Q in this historical Biblical authorship sense was the supposed group of old testament priests that wrote all of the old testament books up until the Babylonian exile. This fictitious rendering of these OT docs. was thought to be the way the priests were able to keep Judaism alive while the people were in exile. It seems they are also reportedly the way synagogues were developed?
I am going to have to go back and check this out. I didn’t connect Q to anything biblical because the fiction being used by “biblical minimalists” to try to destroy the Bible and its Truth isn’t anything I want anything to do with.
To clarify - as I read + understood the suggestion from the origin of the identity “Q” at the time (last year) - some considered that there is a reference to “Q” books akin to the Book(s) of Enoch. There was never any lineage purported or stated but, rather, reading “Q” is like reading the other concurrently written works at the time of those books actually incorporated into the Bible - like a ring side seat. The settled upon interpretation, however, “Q-Anon” = “Q level security clearance”.