I am a two issue voter. Second Amendment and pro life. If you are fine with limiting my rights to self defense or murdering children, you are scum. Period.
Nelson and Scott are both scum. Scott is worse in that he pretends to be on our side, but only because he has to. He would disarm us in a heartbeat if he thought he could get away with it.
In any case, if you fail as a candidate on those two issues, nothing else you say or do mitigates it. I generally find that grabbers and child killers tend to be dishonest anyway, so nothing else they say can be trusted.
I will not tolerate a traitor. Not for convenience, not for any reason. If you set two men in front of me, one my enemy and one a traitor within the ranks, with the means to utterly defeat one of them, I will choose to defeat the traitor every single time.
Traitors are more dangerous than enemies.
Since you used the word "you" in your post, I have to assume your comment was directed at my worldview and not Scott's
First of all, if you think I'm scum you can KMA and ESAD...douchebag
I can assure you I'm strongly pro 2A and "shall not infringe" means exactly how it reads: period end of story and I'm extremely pro life.
I'm not sure what world you live in, but here in reality, we normally are left with picking the lesser of two evils. Rarely do we get great candidates to support and vote for.
If you think Scott is scum traitor, don't vote for him (If you are a Floridian) sit home and gloat over your principles with you nose in the air.
Not voting means you are by default voting for Nelson.
Never, ever bitch about Nelson again since you had a flawed but far better choice but choose to not engage in our process.