Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker

I never heard that. Could you summarize what happened? I always assumed it didn’t develop enough support to win elections.


916 posted on 05/06/2018 7:43:28 AM PDT by mairdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 863 | View Replies ]


To: mairdie; edzo4
One good reminder: the Tea Party movement finally collapsed under the weight of such profiteers.

I never heard that. Could you summarize what happened? I always assumed it didn’t develop enough support to win elections.

Tea Party movement is alive and well. It now is called Q.

922 posted on 05/06/2018 7:51:29 AM PDT by TruthWillWin ([MSM])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 916 | View Replies ]

To: mairdie

Some of the most successful “Tea Party” organizations ended up being big money-makers for their organizers, rather than dedicated to the cause.

Here’s one article: https://www.thedailybeast.com/flushing-money-down-the-tea-party-toilet

To be fair, those who were hosting rallies, particularly with national figures like Palin in support of local candidates, were delivering value other than through straight grants to candidates. But the big players also ended up taking big salaries and doing a lot of self-dealing. They squeezed out the legit grassroots group and just didn’t bother to build anything sustaining.

Just look at what Sal Russo sucked out of it:

https://www.alternet.org/story/150902/5_professional_tea_partiers%3A_who%27s_sucking_the_most_money_from_the_movement


953 posted on 05/06/2018 9:25:16 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 916 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson