What about the “update” that expresses doubt this is real?
I’ve seen enough demonic activity to believe it, but I’m not sure the author is convinced.
I agree with Mr. Dreher’s final conclusion that this is almost certainly something of a parody document, for whatever purpose. However, I also believe that he is right in contending that the plan described has a realistic chance of working, should someone decide to take it up.
He had some examples from Britain, but here in the U.S., we have the women teachers having sex with junior-high students, a phenomenon which is treated as humorous or even praiseworthy. In summary, when you have a sexual ethic that has no criterion other than “consent,” then nobody is excluded other than pre-verbal infants, and even then, there’s the “implied consent” argument: “She didn’t stop me, so she must have wanted it.”
It does a real good job at describing how homosexuals used media manipulation to get people accepting and supporting homosexuality. One problem: something article said about getting pederasty accepted before pedophila (something akin). That sounds manipulative. Another thing: progressive Hollywood is backing this? I know Corey Feldman believes that, but that sounds like it’s trying to convince the people that already believe Pedowood...Hollywood is full of evil people.