You create fictional worlds without evidence. You don’t even seem to understand mundane stuff like “facts” and “evidence” and “knowledge” and “reality.” What you call “connecting the dots” is what far more knowledgeable people call “just making stuff up as you go.”
Like I said, Enchante. You keep living in a CNN world. I'll try to remember to let you know what's really going on. Or not. It may amuse me to keep you floundering about sputtering about "evidence" and "facts."
In the meantime. You keep waiting for the New York Times to privde your evidence. Or maybe Fox News is more your cup of tea?
I'll just keep "making stuff up" over here.
:)
Bagster
Oh, that's rich.
Keep telling yourself that.
Bagster
‘You create fictional worlds without evidence. You don’t even seem to understand mundane stuff like “facts” and “evidence” and “knowledge” and “reality.” What you call “connecting the dots” is what far more knowledgeable people call “just making stuff up as you go.”’
This is exactly, detail for detail, what the Obots do. Obotism also has cultish features, btw. Their ground rules are that Obama is a superior being who is honorable inside and out and who never lies. If it *appears* that Obama has lied then this is merely a perception problem. The Obot will weave a fanciful, elaborate tale which always concludes with the same line: ‘So you see, Obama was telling the truth all along.’
In Obot-world, the definition of ‘evidence,’ is: anything an Obot can concoct with his/her unfettered imagination.
The definition of ‘fact,’ is: any product of an Obot’s imagination that works in Obama’s favor.
Not making anything up. I’ve interacted with Obots for years, and this is really how they operate.
Ditto Qers. Facts and evidence are based on two things: Q’s posts and the Qers’ imagination. Fact.