[bagster]

So what is it?

Oh, geez. Really?

Okay. Let's stay on NK just to make it easy. So Q is giving us all these clues about goings on in North Korea, right? People are digging, riddling, theorizing, looking at mainstream media reports, comparing, more theorizing. Then people analyze all the collected data as best they can.

THEN...some people say. Hey, I think this happened or that happened. Other people look at that and say, hey. That fits. Yep. That's what happened. And this is what will be the most likely outcome of that. Then. Two weeks later, or a month....BOOM. It happens.

North Korea announces it will de nukelify and make peace with South Korea...

When CNN announces it, or the NY Times or Fox News. Then YOU know it. The Q birds that have been paying attention KNEW, about as close as anybody not actually involved can know. It's not like I (for example) knew beyond a doubt that it would happen.

So do you see how your question itself is the wrong question? You are looking at the whole Q thing wrongly. That's what's so frustrating about you guys. You see Q one way, we see it a whole nother way. And never the twain shall meet, apparently.

So no. I didn't go out and say a month ago. North Korea has met with Donald Trump secretly and arranged a deal with China brokering and backing it. They will announce it in a month.

And it works like that with just about all of the other Q stuff.

Bagster

[eldoradude]

Then people analyze all the collected data as best they can

It's basically getting the raw feed before a blogger or other 'source' puts it together and it gets posted on FR.

A lot of confusion results from all of the noise and multiple conclusions, not all of which are well thought out. There is definite lunatic fringe that camps out, including some well meaning but kookoo Truthers.

There was quite an echo chamber on this thread for a while from the usual suspects - it was like they were afraid of drowning clinging to each other but not trusting the lifebouy offered.

[kevao]

You must admit that “We knew about Trump meeting with Kim in the forbidden city and making a deal with him weeks before any word of it came out” comes off as very matter-of-fact, thus my questions at which you to umbrage.

What you say now is that you did not, in fact, know this would take place for a certainty beforehand. Only that, once it was announced, Hey! all these disparate pieces of info I knew beforehand now fit together and make perfect sense in hindsight.

And if that is not a mischaracterization of where you are at, then I have nothing critical to say of you or the Q.