I explained in #319 why no one should mistake “Q” for someone highly knowledgeable in military and strategic matters.
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3652490/posts?page=319#319
Unless you can explain how/why I am wrong, it is you who are among the sheep. Actually, I think of Bagspit as more of a weasel.
Didn’t click LoL
Also, some of Q’s sillier moments have to do with old CIA programs “MKULTRA” and “Operation Mockingbird.”
These were exposed and “supposedly” shut down completely in the ‘70s. Of course, I would not put it past the CIA to have revived/extended/expanded such programs in some form or other. BUT they certainly wouldn’t be going under THOSE code names after they were so publicly exposed and disgraced in the ‘70s. The fact that Q thinks those particular code names are still current and relevant indicates that he is versed in web-based conspiracy accounts but NOT in the least knowledgeable about any current CIA or secretive intel activities. For the CIA would never be using those code names NOW. If in fact the CIA has continued such programs they most surely would be under new code names and auspices. Therefore, Q is merely relying upon what he has read about those programs operating many decades ago.
you're wrong
So can either of you refute the analysis in #319?
Do you accept it?
Or are you both as ignorant as Q?
Instead of insults and quips, try a few minutes of serious discussion and show us all what Q (y’all) can do.
US Navy 101, deployments of carrier battle groups according to Q, please begin:
We’re all waiting, breathlessly....