Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Enchante

That was fascinating—thanks for the breakdown. I once incited a lynch mob by merely pointing out that Q doesn’t talk about ‘our savior,’ the way Christians do. Q is certainly not who it’s claimed to be.


328 posted on 05/04/2018 5:35:19 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]


To: Fantasywriter

Exactly. There are all sorts of “tells” for anyone who knows much of anything about some of Q’s varied topics. Of course, the Q-cult thrives on the mystery and the fact that in many cases it is difficult to “prove the negative.”

Can I “prove” that “Q” is not some high-level military intelligence officer, DoD official, or White House national security official close to POTUS Trump, etc.?? Of course I can’t “prove” that but I’ll say it is “virtually inconceivable” and the people who can’t see that really don’t know very much. There are too many “tells” about Q’s amateur status as some kind of internet enthusiast, scouring the web for interesting nuggets to throw into not very well digested Q-drops. There are too many things that “Q” doesn’t know or understand, that he would if he were really any high-level muckety-muck.

fwiw, I don’t tend to think that Q is some kind of nefarious psyops working against Team Trump interests (although that is of course a possibility). All that I have seen of the Q corpus suggests to me some amateur internet enthusiast, well versed in some things but unaware of his limitations. I think he is probably sincerely pro-Trump and not anti- but the whole “Q level security clearance, high level military intel or White House official” kind of nonsense is just garbage. I think Q is much older than a teenager, bc a teen would be very unlikely to have amassed all the particulars and contexts that Q has displayed (although of course it is possible via sufficient web surfing). So my bet is that Q is some obsessive adult LARPer who wanted to gin up enthusiasm for his version of the Trump agenda.

Is that so bad? Well I think trying to structure any “movement” around false pretences and false beliefs is a bad thing, even if it is intended ultimately to be helpful.

POTUS Trump doesn’t need fake LARPers putting out false schemas, no matter how much “real” info may be included along the way.


349 posted on 05/04/2018 6:32:32 PM PDT by Enchante (FusionGPS "dirty dossier" scandal links Hillary, FBI, CIA, Dept of Justice... "Deep State" is real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson