You are in no position to form an opinion, based on your own testimony.
Your words are wind.
B.s. you have reading comprehension difficulties.
I argue about the things I DO think I have some basis to think, and then I also note places where I do not think there is sufficient evidence to decide something.
THAT is a how a more careful, thoughtful mind would approach these matters.
It is NOT a game to just try to always take a strong stance and bludgeon or ridicule others into submission.
I give examples of actually THINKING about this stuff and not just swallowing/regurgitating.
I am sad that you cannot grasp my method.
You ripped my words out of context, as you often do. The CONCLUSION of my train of thought in that post was that between options such as (not an exhaustive list) (1) Silly LARP , (2) adolescent MAGA LARP, (3) serious ADULT MAGA LARP, (4) AI program, (5) Deep State psyops etc. etc. I don’t try to take a definite position on THOSE kinds of issues.
That does not mean I didn’t just indicate reasons I don’t take “Q” to be what he pretends to be.
It should not be necessary to spell this kind of thing out in every comment, but you don’t argue in good faith.
We need Fantasy Writer’s fine synopsis of “Q alternatives” — I will have to look that up again.