[edzo4]

it was BAGSTER who started trolling the thread about "Q" not me. I responded with my opinion about "Q" because it was BAGSTER who had mocked me and cited "Q lives" as some great authority. Once again, you have totally misrepresented matters. You are fundamentally dishonest. You take a non-Q thread the BAGSTER trolled and try to turn my response into going out of my way to comment upon or "troll" anyone about Q.

OHHH OHHH the stupid troll put it's foot in it's mouth again....

Liar liar pants on fire,

SO if you hadn't trolled Q threads before April as you've claimed a dozen plus times how did you know what bagster meant by "Q lives" in February?

pathetic, can't wait to here the spin and excuses for this one...

[Enchante]

Good heavens you are so stooopid. It is impossible to have a reasonable discussion with you since you always make such silly leaps of illogic and foolish assumption.

(1) I had read a decent amount about Q away from FR. I lurk on Reddit a certain amount, although not yet motivated to comment there, and I have surfed a bit of the chan boards and some of the commentary sites, though not at all consistently. So I knew a certain amount about Q with no reference to FreeRepublic. Do you really think this is the only site on the web?????

(2) I MIGHT have read any amount of Q stuff on FR before April, without commenting. SO your comment is idiotic, as usual; once again you prove incapable of analyzing even the simplest bits of evidence. But in fact, I don’t think I had seen very much about Q on FR except all the silly troll comments that Q-propagandists would make on various threads, i.e., I had not sought out the “official” Q threads at all until fairly recently.