Who is #Qanon? (really interesting 19:30 video)

Feb. are just Q reacting to the news cycle, like I already stated.

301 posted on 05/04/2018 4:57:08 PM PDT by corlorde

If you ever care to drop in on a Q discussion sans virtually all of the childishness and most of tge nastiness, there’s an interesting thread on Ar15.com. I have found it to be more informative and far less vicious. Skeptics post regularly:

https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/Saudi-Arabian-Purge-Happening-Now-With-More-Links-in-OP-/5-2048525/?page=908

302 posted on 05/04/2018 4:58:13 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)

Hahahahaha can you be more lame. Sorry pretending it doesn’t exist doesn’t disprove it.

303 posted on 05/04/2018 4:59:53 PM PDT by edzo4

To: Basket_of_Deplorables

Don't forget their Q-Prayer: "There is no God but Q, and Jerome Corsi is his prophet"

Q, all blessings be upon him, will not be mocked.

You are debunked and I declare fatwa on you.

Inshalla

Bagster

304 posted on 05/04/2018 5:00:02 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)

It is useless to try to debate or reason with Bagspit.

Yes, you're right. It is hopeless. Lay down your arms and return to your homes. The grownups have this under control.

Also, let me know when you or your cult ever attempt to debate.

I take "one of the worst of the Q cult" as high praise.

ThankQ, Enfagte. :)

Bagster

305 posted on 05/04/2018 5:04:39 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)

It’s a month ahead of the news cycle you stupid troll, but again thank you for allowing me to show other freepers how biased you are and how you and the other trolls merely spew taking points of the msm like the NY times and Washington post. While the freepers are exposed to the actual info and allowed to make up their own minds. Thanks again

306 posted on 05/04/2018 5:06:24 PM PDT by edzo4

The cult will not give up their belief system quietly.

Said the raven to the crow.

Resistance is futile.

We are Q.

Bagster

307 posted on 05/04/2018 5:06:33 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)

I hear you, hard to ignore the red flag waving sometimes. I get that way about the Protestant vs Catholic threads, but I manage to ignore them. Back and forth is quite entertaining. What is the down side of Q though? It’s not pro-DS or pro-democrat, so maybe just scroll on past and let it go.

308 posted on 05/04/2018 5:07:10 PM PDT by eldoradude (Walk a mile in a man's shoes and he'll never catch you.)

To: Basket_of_Deplorables

They'll break away eventually. It's happened a few times on FR.

And leave you codgers in your rocking chairs harumphing about Jeff Sessions?

Not a chance. Somebody must lead you. We are here to stay, grampy.

Bagster

309 posted on 05/04/2018 5:09:24 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)

To: Fantasywriter

310 posted on 05/04/2018 5:09:56 PM PDT by edzo4

To: Fantasywriter

gutter-level crud on this thread

The sniveling continues. Buck up, buttercup.

Bagster

311 posted on 05/04/2018 5:10:51 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)

Bol—it wasn’t posted to you.

312 posted on 05/04/2018 5:13:53 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)

To: Fantasywriter

Try harder

those with a high enough iQ will understand. LoL

313 posted on 05/04/2018 5:16:57 PM PDT by edzo4

“It’s a month ahead of the news cycle you stupid troll”

No it isn’t.

725
Feb 11 2018

“Ask yourself, why is NK participating in the O-games this year?”

that’s not a month ahead

“Ask yourself, why is the ‘sister’ w/ Pence?”

It was reported in the news cycle that day.

Kim Jong-un’s Sister Turns On the Charm, Taking Pence’s Spotlight

By MOTOKO RICH and CHOE SANG-HUN FEB. 11, 2018

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/11/world/asia/kim-yo-jong-mike-pence-olympics.html

The rest of the Q drop you posed are just questions, based on the Olympics. Again, in the news cycle.

314 posted on 05/04/2018 5:18:26 PM PDT by corlorde

To: Basket_of_Deplorables

Pssst...bagster...your Q-baby is ugly!

When is Bagster going to see the baby.

I saw bagster’s assholery

My assholery is second to none.

Couldn’t jump in at the time.

Well, you're here to save the day now, Dudley Do-Right.

(Bagster) is an important guy

On this we can agree.

Bagster

315 posted on 05/04/2018 5:18:54 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)

To: Basket_of_Deplorables

....."'safespaces"....

316 posted on 05/04/2018 5:19:36 PM PDT by caww

The rest of the Q drop you posed are just questions, based on the Olympics. Again, in the news cycle.

You at very child-like. Leave the thinking to the grups. We got this.

Bagster

317 posted on 05/04/2018 5:23:53 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)

To: edzo4; Fantasywriter

Didn’t click. :^)

BOOM

Bagster

318 posted on 05/04/2018 5:25:18 PM PDT by bagster ("She had brown sugar, all over her booga wooga." Bob Marley)

38

Nov 2 2017

Four carriers & escorts in the pacific?

Why is that relevant?

To prevent other state actors from attempting to harm us during this transition? Russia / China?

Or conversely all for NK? Or all three.

Think logically about the timing of everything happening.

========================================================

This was one of the early Q-drops which made it obvious (unlike you I would not say "proves" because of course there is usually room for dispute) that "Q" is neither highly knowledgeable about military/strategic matters nor competent to instruct the nascent Q-cult.

There were 5, not 4, US CVNs at sea in the Pacific in Nov. 2017, but only 3 of them (not 4) were involved in the brief exercises in the Sea of Japan. 2 others were doing relatively brief readiness and training exercises off the west coast of the USA, many thousands of miles from Asia. 3 met up briefly (a few days) for exercises in the Sea of Japan. Yes, this was obviously a kind of show of force to NK, China, and Russia, as well as supportive for our allies. But NO, it was not about some ongoing, long-term shield to "To prevent other state actors from attempting to harm us during this transition? Russia / China?" BECAUSE we were not going to be keeping all these carrier groups in that area for long. Most of the time there is ONE carrier group in the western Pacific, and that is what we reverted to very soon. So yes, show of force for deterrence, that was obvious in the news reports and no one needed "Q" to say that. BUT NO, it was not designed at all to "prevent other state actors from attempting to harm us during this transition" because the transition is much more long-term and still ongoing. The deployment of 3 (not 4) carrier groups together was very brief, only a matter of days (not months or years). Deterrence? Yes. We showed the bad guys what we might do if we needed to. But the Q-drop tries to make it sound like we could keep 3 (not 4) carrier groups on station in the western Pacific all the time, and that did not and would not happen absent the most extreme emergency. Q knows nothing about how US carrier battle groups are deployed, hence he is not senior "military intelligence" or some high-ranking DOD official(s), never mind someone close to POTUS Trump. Q is a LARPer.

We are still in the "transition" period to whatever may happen wrt NK, but no, we are not keeping 3 (not 4) carrier groups on station in the Sea of Japan. Q is just grasping at items in the news and trying to pretend to be expert, spewing his often shaky grasp of he's not quite sure what.

319 posted on 05/04/2018 5:26:01 PM PDT by Enchante (FusionGPS "dirty dossier" scandal links Hillary, FBI, CIA, Dept of Justice... "Deep State" is real)

“You at?” “Grups?” Your vision blurry?

320 posted on 05/04/2018 5:26:05 PM PDT by corlorde

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794