Posted on 05/03/2018 8:06:25 PM PDT by Beave Meister
Yea, I was just about to ask if you were a list-maker.
*another eye roll*
Q lives
Not really. You just said you weren't a troll.
Is trolling trolls trolling?
I say Nay!
Tis’ merely a taste of you own medicine...
YOU TROLL
I leave troll control in your capable hands.
I think he's about ready to pop.
Since I don’t know what your stoopid troll games are about I don’t have any goal in mind here, but I certainly won’t “pop” whatever you may mean by that. I will say what I like.
They obviously need another QDump.
I warned them about “Concord”. Did they listen. No.
rofl, I would say “they are going insane” except that they are already so obviously certifiably BONKERS.
Do you believe Q is white hat, black hat or other?
I’ll tell you what I think to try to address your question if you will tell me what you think. I actually do enjoy civilized, reasonable discussions, even if I seem to spend too much time swatting at flies lately.
The main thing that I believe, with considerable confidence, is that “Q” is not some high-level person in US military intel or White House, DoD, etc. who is tasked directly by POTUS Trump with his Q-mission.
I think that Q is probably some version of a passionate, amateur internet expositor (or a professional who is imitating same) who may or may not believe a lot of stuff he puts out.
A lot of stuff Q seems to say would certainly support MAGA and Trump very strongly. For that I am encouraged and agree with all pro-Trump pro-MAGA type messages, yet I do not trust the “source” at all.
I also take very seriously those who think that because so much in Q’s messages support a “TRUST” theme wrt Justice Dept and taking down Deep State, etc. that it may all be a grand psyops hoax to make MAGA-oriented people complacent etc. OR, because there is a fair amount of ridiculous stuff in the Q-stream, it could be a hoax meant to distract, confuse, and divide pro-Trump conservatives. But I don’t claim to know one way or the other. I simply think Q’s messages need to be viewed with a considerable amount of distrust and suspicion unless/until fully justified.
But I freely admit I have not examined Q stuff closely enough to have a definite view about “who/what he really is” — my main point of reference is that I hold a very strong view about what he is NOT. I do not believe he has close Trump or intel connections, that he/they are in some organized MAGA Q-group to take down the Deep State and save the day etc.
You have been up for 14 hours.
5/8/2018, 3:29:18 AM · 27 of 51
Enchante to Innovative
“says he feels less constrained to share his thoughts because he is not seeking reelection.”
5/8/2018, 7:35:04 PM · 45 of 45
Enchante to Basket_of_Deplorables; Fantasywriter
Nice of you to admit your chronic dishonesty, Sen. McCain!
No, I got a few good hours of sleep somewhere in there. I don’t always sleep in normal spells but I do get sleep.
No, I got a few good hours of sleep somewhere in there. I don’t always sleep in normal spells but I do get sleep.
OR, because there is a fair amount of ridiculous stuff in the Q-stream, it could be a hoax meant to distract, confuse, and divide pro-Trump conservatives. But I don’t claim to know one way or the other. I simply think Q’s messages need to be viewed with a considerable amount of distrust and suspicion unless/until fully justified.
You do realize that POTUS does not have to destroy Q right? All he needs is one tweet that says “Qanon is fake news” and it would be over. But, he hasn’t done that has he?
Why do you suppose this hasn’t happened?
Does it ever seem as if the focus on skeptics ***personally*** has gone too far? The guidelines say to stick with the issues. For some reason, the trust-Sessions community seems overly focussed on the personal details of skeptics.
TL/DR
:)
That doesn't sound like the personal habits of somebody that trains for triathalons.
Have you been caught in another tall tale?
Troll.
And yet you're sure he's not who he says he is. How does that work?
That sounds funny coming from maybe the biggest troll on FR.
Good question, one I also do wonder about. But I don’t think POTUS Trump and the closest circle of his advisers pay any mind to “Q” whatsoever. I could be wrong, of course, but I doubt they are too aware beyond possibly the slightest basic glimmer of what’s going on with “Q” discussions online.... to the extent they may be aware of what’s going on with it all, they may be comfortable with the idea that it is getting people interested and motivated to learn more. I doubt that they would bother to knock it down with even one statement unless it was becoming any huge problem (to the country).
Now, of course, if POTUS Trump suddenly gives an explicit Q-affirming statement of some kind, then everything I have thought about “Q” would be thrown out. But so far, I do not see any reason to accept the idea that Q is some high level insider close to and acting for POTUS Trump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.