To: Vigilanteman
"My Dad was a vet. Wonderful man who loved animals, but he wouldn't even waste a drug on this type of dog. He would take it out back and shoot it in the head. A slug from a .38 is a lot cheaper than the drug and cleanup."
Good man. All police should learn just enough about animal anatomy to do the same for anyone else. Residents should be able to do it, too, but that might require a rural setting without laws against firearms discharges in many cases.
From the front of the animal, just about a half inch above and between the eyes, aiming downward a little toward the target (perpendicular enough and not too oblique). From the side of the dog, the midpoint between the eye and the ear.
A .22LR will do it just fine if fired properly. I stunned cattle and other livestock for slaughter that way as a young man.
39 posted on
05/03/2018 3:44:02 PM PDT by
familyop
("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
To: familyop
.
“Stunning” cattle for slaughter is what leaves the meat full of blood and shock hormones, making it a poor choice as food.
.
46 posted on
05/03/2018 3:58:00 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: familyop
A .22LR will do it just fine if fired properlyYes, it will, but requires accuraccy. Ideally, the dog should be on a short leash so the slug goes midway between the eye and ear.
96 posted on
05/04/2018 6:04:44 AM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson