"5G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on top of [added to] the 2G, 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, etc. for telecommunications already in place."
The fallacy is that technological advance is not, necessarily, an an "ever-increasing-sum game"
As superior technology is introduced, preceding, inferior technologies are abandoned. (Go try and purchase a newly-produced and sold 2G device...)
It is reasonable to propose that, adding a device with reduced physiological risk (5G) -- that displaces another with much higher [theoretical, unproved] risk (2G, 3G) results in a net sum lower risk.
~~~~~~~~~~~
BTW, since we're on a conservative forum, I'll predict that there is a very high probability that those "more than 180" (WHOOPEE!) panic-fomenting "scientists and doctors from 35 countries" also subscribe to the pseudoscientific fallacy of "Gorebull Wahruming".
FRegards,
TXnMA
