There are so many weasel words/expressions, especially in the final paragraph of this article. It implies that the Dem accusers, though using a pronoun to obfuscate, claim that info was based on interviews with23 current and former members of Jackson’s office. Maybe 22 previous (Obama) and one present? Who knows. Maybe the current ones said that they were unaware of any problems with Jackson. Maybe all but one said the same. All of this anonymous source fake news needs to stop.
Their main goal, in my opinion, is to keep anyone from working for PDJT or even considering entering elective office if they are not a part of the swamp.