......”Those of us who have followed Q have a VERY broad based knowledge of new information that others don’t”....
Right...ok..you can think that.
As for “Free your mind”...( a favorite expression used by the New Agers and the like) I choose to guard and protect the door of my mind and remain focused on the truth, not ‘follow’ by writers and all the whimsical games and supposed or articulated “hints” in order to string together a series of possibilities to hang my opinions on.
As for being a troll....I’ve been a long term participant on FR. But admittedly, and for the most part, stay away from threads where folks believe they’re information is superior to others unless you agree.
Caww, you ever heard of MOONCHILDREN?
ThankQ for your kind permission.
I choose to guard and protect the door of my mind and remain focused on the truth,
Some would call that having a "closed mind." Myself amongst them.
not follow by writers and all the whimsical games and supposed or articulated hints in order to string together a series of possibilities to hang my opinions on.
Now that you have taken my wise advice and opened your mind, essentially freeing it from it's shackles, the "whimsical games" and "hints," as you call them, can lead you to new avenues of thinking and information that you wouldn't otherwise have known. To connections that you can now make between information points that you DID know and new information.
As for being a troll....Ive been a long term participant on FR. But admittedly, and for the most part, stay away from threads where folks believe theyre information is superior to others unless you agree.
a.) Being a long term FR participant does not preclude one from being a troll. Ever heard of Humblegunner? And there are various types of trolls.
b.) You are not doing a very good job, in this case, of staying away from this thread. One in which our information, generally, is very superior to the general information of the participants who do not populate this thread. This is a scientific fact and cannot be disputed.
c.) People on this thread disagree all the time. This is not a convention of yes men. I suppose you mean "agree" on the validity of Q? Well, for the most part, yes. We mostly agree on the validity of the messenger to varying degrees. But we debate and argue the message constantly.
I think you have a close minded bias against the Q information based on your underlying premise that "Q" is fake. You are missing out on an opportunity, goodman. I recommend you rethink your position and urge you to jump aboard the Q car (attached to the Trump train.)
#TheAwakening