Not much.
April 2014, studies confirmed the presence of radioactive tuna off the coasts of the Pacific U.S. Researchers carried out tests on 26 albacore tuna caught prior to the 2011 power plant disaster and those caught after.
However, the amount of radioactivity is less than that found naturally in a single banana. Caesium-137 and caesium-134 have been noted in Japanese whiting in Tokyo Bay as of 2016. “Concentration of radiocesium in the Japanese whiting was one or two orders of magnitude higher than that in the sea water, and an order of magnitude lower than that in the sediment.” They were still within food safety limits.
Wikipedia
First, I have for you a graphical representation of the difference in energy radioactive energy between like amounts of Potassium-40 (as in a banana) and Cesium-137:
Using a standard American Football field as a unit of measure (100 yards, or about 91 ½ meters), if a human hairs thickness represents the energy in a unit of Potassium 40, take the graphic below, which represents 18 rows of 60 football fields:
Think of the thickness of that human hair (0.001 mm) representing the energy of Potassium 40, stand in the end zone of a football field and place the hair underneath the goal post. Now imagine all the pictured football fields end-to-end (all 1080 of them, representing 108,000 yards).
THATs roughly how much more energy Cesium-137 has than Potassium-40. Again, 100 Billion times more energy.
However, if you can imagine that it could, it does get much worse than that: The graphic above does not take into account the daughter product of Cesium-137s decay, which is Barium-137; the graphic only accounts for the Beta radiation of Potassium-40 & Cesium-137, not the Gamma resulting from Barium-137.
The specific activity of Barium-137 is 540 million Curies/gram ¬ on top of Cs-137s 88 Ci/g solely from beta decay as compared to Potassium-40s; put that in your banana and smoke it.