Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Zzyzx
Take the skull of someone who has died that we have a photo of and hand it to these guys to see how close they come.

Much of the technology comes from forensic reconstruction, where they do a reconstruction and then try matching it against missing people. In those cases, they do often get feedback on how well they did.

15 posted on 04/23/2018 10:50:54 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625; publius911; Dr. Zzyzx; WKUHilltopper; BobL
as PapaBear3625, yeah, these reconstructions are very close to the original, as they are based on the average depth of tissue over each part of the skull. If DNA is available, skin, eye, and hair color and ethnicitiy can be made much more accurate, leading to a further improvement of the likeness. When the remains are of an historical figure for whom a contemporary photo, portrait, or sculpture exists, comparisons can be made (such as happened with Robespierre, Richard III, King Tut, etc).

20 posted on 04/23/2018 11:36:05 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson