What? Who? Not following at all ! Clarification needed
There was discussion of the initials AS in a drop that stated Valarie Jarret spent 43 minutes on a call with AS, which the aggregators annotated as ‘Andrew Schiff’. FReeQs were divided between Anton Scalia and Adam Schiff.
Q said the call utilized various forms of anti-tracking, but it was listened in to. Q also stated ‘Article 3 Section 3’. My error (I just realized) was to conflate that w/the subject of the call. I now think Q was characterizing the nature of the conversation as a whole, not describing the substance/content.
I then did a search for ‘Andrew Schiff’. There not only is such a person, he is an MD and an investment banker/venture capitalist, a member of the prominent Schiff banking family which is included in the article that has been linked here about the 13 bloodlines. He was previously married to Gore’s daughter. (note: Gore has made the drops lately)
So: I suggested we accept the aggregator interpretation of ‘AS’ as Andrew Schiff and go from there: why would he and ValJar talk so long and (since I was wrong on the subject, which is still unknown)think about why they would speaking so long and why Q then mentions Art. 3 Sec 3.
Whew.
I’m in and out here, between work, chores and sleep. Still way behind.