Comment on DNC "lawsuit": DNC already has a moribund publicity lawsuit which the press has became bored of--hence the need to refile it as a "new" suit before mid-terms. As an accurate publisher of newsworthy information @WikiLeaks is constitutionally protected from such suits.
2:26 PM · Apr 20, 2018
According to WikiLeaks the DNC has a previous lawsuit. Any information when it was filed and what it contained?
See post 1786
Iirc there were at least two possibly three suicides/murders of witnesses in their original lawsuit. Out of Florida ,iirc
Midterms are a factor. They need anything to rally their base. Get those donations flowing. Stir up issues that their base can get riled up about; red meat.
Not sure they had a lawsuit active. The issue has been and remains ‘Hack vs. Leak’. It was a leak, not a hack.
Hack —> Outsider
Leak —> Insider
DNC needed and still needs to claim ‘Hack’ but early evidence with computer metadata on word files showed alteration from a DNC employee to a fake Russian name. It was amateur hour.
Then someone, ostensibly a DNC contractor, created ‘Guccifer 2.0’ which was found to be fake using a Russian text translator with poor cryptic Russian grammar and usage.
So yeah, Wikileaks is likely accurate that this is a rehash of a previous failed attempt to create publicity. Lawyers need and love money.