Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke
Elizabeth Warren thinks your 401k funds should be invested in annuities managed by the federal government.

My 401(k) is invested in the stock of the company I work for. How would Warren force me to invest in her annuities without selling my company holdings?

What would that do to my company's assets if shareholders were all forced to divest in order to fund government annuities? Who would be the buyer of a forced sale, the government? Wouldn't that be a de facto nationalization of companies whose workers invested their retirement savings?

-PJ

56 posted on 04/16/2018 11:09:49 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

Political Junkie Too wrote: My 401(k) is invested in the stock of the company I work for. How would Warren force me to invest in her annuities without selling my company holdings?

You would lose control over the investments in your 401K. The government would sell any current assets and invest the revenue in government long term bonds and give you an annuity upon retirement. Really simple to write the laws.

While I haven’t heard this proposed, I’m sure the dems would want to enforce some kind of retirement equality where the amount of the annuity would not be 100% proportional to the amount you put in.


63 posted on 04/16/2018 11:28:45 AM PDT by DugwayDuke ("A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too

Political Junkie Too wrote: What would that do to my company’s assets if shareholders were all forced to divest in order to fund government annuities? Who would be the buyer of a forced sale, the government? Wouldn’t that be a de facto nationalization of companies whose workers invested their retirement savings?

Why would the government be overly concerned with trivial matters like that? If they were, they could schedule the liquidation of those assets over a period of time to minimize the downside.

De facto nationalization would be viewed as a positive, not a negative.


65 posted on 04/16/2018 11:32:56 AM PDT by DugwayDuke ("A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too

My 401(k) is invested in the stock of the company I work for.


Danger, danger, Will Robinson. You need to diversify. Having all the eggs in one basket is high risk.


74 posted on 04/16/2018 11:46:11 AM PDT by sparklite2 (See more at Sparklite Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson