Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This article was actually about Australia, but I think the possibility also exists that America may consider these sorts of measures.
1 posted on 04/13/2018 1:12:28 AM PDT by cba123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cba123

http://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/motoring/hitech/drivers-using-mobile-phones-could-be-fined-without-even-knowing-theyve-been-caught/news-story/ecb141e8552b39560f7f395802e447d7


2 posted on 04/13/2018 1:12:59 AM PDT by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cba123

Big Brother has already been here and gone, leaving all of his illegitimate government-funding children behind. Wait until you find out that your cell-phone and house-wiring reporting every thought yoy have, every flatulent noise your body emits. This is freedom? This is liberty to do as you choose?


3 posted on 04/13/2018 2:41:57 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cba123

Like so called red light cameras, they will be illegal in many if not all states ...


4 posted on 04/13/2018 2:51:08 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cba123

Theirs is an Australian problem and perhaps they’ll do what they need to do. Ours is an American problem and we should have done what needed to do a long time ago. Something is wrong when you’re safer among drivers who have had 4-5 drinks than people who are texting and driving in any driving conditions. In Michigan, if you’ve been busted twice before for DUI and get caught a third time, you’re facing felony charges. The penalties for texting and driving should be same. Police departments all over the country should add “device squads” as a sub-group of their vice squads...and why don’t we hear anything from Mothers Against Drunk Drivers (MADD) about getting tough on texting and driving?


8 posted on 04/13/2018 3:48:33 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cba123

No handsfree via Bluetooth?


13 posted on 04/13/2018 4:23:31 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine ("Married with children.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cba123

Nothing wrong with a phone call, especially when it’s hands free. It’s texting that must be stopped.

Cops in (I believe) one of the Carolinas, drive around with partners in tractor trailer cabs looking down into cars where they get an excellent view of texters.


14 posted on 04/13/2018 4:50:17 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cba123

I think gun owners should be allowed to shoot them out of their hands.


18 posted on 04/13/2018 5:27:59 AM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cba123

I’d like to see it in place, but only by states that ban the use of cell phones as most already ban texting. If you’re going to have a law to enforce safety, then use it.

A 2014 report from the National Safety Council, which compiles data on injuries and fatalities from 2013 and earlier, concluded that use of mobile phones caused 26% of U.S. car accidents. Just 5% of mobile phone-related accidents in the U.S. involved texting: “The majority of the accidents involve drivers distracted while talking on handheld or hands-free cellphones.”

In 2010, the State Farm insurance company stated that mobile phone use annually resulted in: 636,000 crashes, 330,000 personal injuries, 12,000 major injuries, 2,700 deaths, and US $43 billion in damages. And uninsured drivers left a lot of the bill to public taxes you and I pay.

We have a hands free law in Washington state where I live. But I don’t think I have ever even heard of a ticket being written to anyone I know for using it the other way. At least this way it can be enforced. And if they are not going to enforce it, then take it off the books. It is just another case of the state riding in on their white horse to save you from the big, bad, cell phone user in a car.

rwood


21 posted on 04/13/2018 7:03:39 AM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cba123

May consider these sorts of measures. Hope so Los Angeles needs it every day someone gets ran over some time 3 times a night.
Hit and run has became the norm here.


22 posted on 04/13/2018 9:36:29 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cba123

I remember distinctly when I began advancing through a red light while using my cell phone. (around 20 years ago)

My attention was clearly divided. I was moved by that incident, to recognize the danger to myself and others.

Fortunately Bluetooth equipped cars came along soon. But even while talking over Bluetooth, I occasionally become distracted by the call.

Here in the Peoples’ Republic of California, you will be cited for using a handheld device while driving.

I see some people with two touchscreen devices mounted on their dash and/or windshields.

Distracted people ARE known to cause accidents.


25 posted on 04/13/2018 3:06:41 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson