Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
***Libby was guilty of what he was charged with***

I know... but it was a process crime, AND Fitzgerald KNEW who really leaked the name... No need for any investigation, no need to question Libby; they wanted to get at Cheney ⇉ Prez. The whole thing has become a rehearsal for the present overthrow of our Republic. And Bush wimped out!

891 posted on 04/13/2018 5:11:33 PM PDT by Bob Ireland (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 881 | View Replies ]


To: Bob Ireland
-- it was a process crime, AND Fitzgerald KNEW who really leaked the name... --

1. The process matters. If we all get a pass on telling what we know, then, well, so much for the truth. I can live with that, by the way, but don;t jive me with any "oath" BS.

2. Leaking is not a "first learker is guilty, everybody else gets a pass" crime.

Plus, Libby wasn't charged or accused of leaking. He told the investigators he didn't know Plame worked at the CIA. There was plenty of evidence that he knew this assertion about his knowledge was not true. Had nothing to do with whether he knew or thought she was a secret squirrel. He claimed to not know squat about where she worked.

-- The whole thing has become a rehearsal for the present overthrow of our Republic. And Bush wimped out! --

Slightly differnt model but I agree with where you put the blame. Libby could have said "Yeah, I know Pla,me worked at the CIA, and I told Russert, Miller and other that." He could have leaked like a sieve, and none of that would have been a crime.

897 posted on 04/13/2018 5:21:58 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 891 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson