Women's sports have just gotten a lot harder. No sexism intended.
Posted on 04/10/2018 7:18:14 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
I think it’s fair. It’s called “equality.” I think Bella Abzug would be proud.
Men are better than women at everything, including being a woman.
Turns out it takes a man to break the glass ceiling?
Who are we to judge that those eight Iranians are not women? We need to check our privilege.
The latest Boston Marathon trends were blazed by Rosie Ruiz.
When historians look back on this period of American history, they will say: so sad, an empire built on human freedom, devolved into a tyranny of perversion and political control, built on a mountain of printed money and debt.
Now that men are women, we can finally get some competent women engineers, managers and ceos
Needs an astersk.
*
Maybe it’s the Flu shots. Soldiers fighting in World War II were the first patients to receive the flu vaccine when it was approved for military use in 1945 and civilian use was approved the following year.
I also have compassion for them. Because they are deeply troubled, disproportionately suffering from depression and committing suicide at extreme rates. They are, in truth, mentally ill. But it's illegal to treat them, instead they must be denied treatment and enabled until they kill themselves so lefties can signal their virtue and feel good about themselves.
That said, if you decide you are a women trapped in a man's body and you want to live as a women, you must not forget that part about having a man's body. Do not engage in competitive sports, even if you love them. it's just not fair to the women.
Rosie Ruiz. Ah I remember her well. Did she have 2 ball bearings that made her win?
Not at EVERY thing. Sorry.
Good article, but don’t say “biological female or biological male.” It’s “Male or female.” No qualifier is needed.
I want more of this. I want more men to join women’s teams and to win. Them, maybe, just maybe, the thick headed pc brain idiots will finally see the truth. But I doubt it.
The US was never going to last forever; the only question was timing and proximate cause. We are now able to recognize the emergence both.
Like Rome, the US has its natural inconsistencies, but a dynamic and resilient society is able to adapt and change. However, the growing problems become manifest when internal (domestic) enemies perceive an advantage from destruction rather than reform.
What I find interesting is that while many/most focus on the decline, like newborns, there are constantly new developments taking place. Because they are not (yet) broadly known, they do not warrant attention until success makes them subjects of the historical record.
For example, while Rome was falling, the church was in ascendance. While the US is falling, virtual societies based on AI, advanced genetics and virtual reality may make nation-states obsolete.
Societies in ascendance are always patrimony based on logic, ability & results. It's a sure tell a nation is in decline when it loses focus on (scientific) progress and becomes focused on internal, emotion needs and wants.
Don't cry for the US; rather, focus on where the action is.
Why not just be the person who came in last and identify as the person who came in first?
Andy really was ahead of his time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.