General consensus?
How about A.D. 45 for Lystra and 2 Corinthians 12 60 A.D.
Your timeline accounts for 9 years. I won’t ask how you derive that.
What I do wonder is whether you doubt that anyone rose from the dead in Acts?
What's the source for your figures?
Your timeline accounts for 9 years. I won’t ask how you derive that.
I used the timeline offered here. However, other sources also support the first missionary encounter in Lystra taking place in 48 A.D.:
http://www.christianitytoday.com/history/issues/issue-47/apostle-paul-and-his-times-christian-history-timeline.html
http://christianityinview.com/paulstimeline.html
http://ssppglenview.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/St._Paul_Timeline_-1.pdf
Even another source that places his first mission between 44 - 46 A.D. (and therefore, the encounter in Lystra, in the latter half of his journey in terms of geographical distance traveled), places the authorship of 2 Corinthians in 57 A.D. Likewise from this source.
And this was using strictly Evangelical/non-denominational sources, by the way.
What I do wonder is whether you doubt that anyone rose from the dead in Acts?
Not at all. Consider in the ninth chapter of Acts, wherein Tabitha is resurrected from the dead during Peter's visit. Likewise Eutychus in Acts 20.
But they're a lot more unequivocal about the reality of death, relative to Paul's stoning in Lystra...and, to get back to the original point, why would Paul's stoning in Lystra (even if it was a true death) have anything to do with his final (as it were) death?
To RevelationDavid:
It is a horrible movie. Extra Biblical... nonsense! Went yesterday and could not believe how bad it was. If you want a movie about “Christ-less Christianity” this is the one for you.
Not exactly sure how you would consider this a 'Christ-less' movie, but are you arguing that anything that is 'extra-Biblical' (aka, not described or portrayed within the bare letter of Scriptures) renders it anti-Biblical or anti-Christian? What exactly about the movie raised your ire so?