In Acts 14 Paul was stoned and left for dead, then he rose up and went to another city. In 2 Corinthians 12 he speaks of the event that occurred 15 years earlier . . . the man that went to glory and saw things unlawful to speak of was Paul.
Believe it or reject it . . . it doesn’t change my understanding of the Scripture one bit.
You do know that, if Paul was left for dead but then went to another city, that logically implies that he didn’t actually die in Lystra, right?